Design and Standby screen part of the review of the Nokia Tube, the 5800 Xpress Music. Full review: www.mobileburn.com
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic Tube review – part 1 of 4
Sun, Aug 1, 2010
25 Responses to “Nokia 5800 XpressMusic Tube review – part 1 of 4”
Leave a Reply
1. August 2010 at 10:04 pm
@BensonBarretto iPhone is about 1.5 times as thick.
1. August 2010 at 11:02 pm
i have nokia 5230 its same only two things are diffrent that camera is 3.15mp with flash and Wi Fi
1. August 2010 at 11:10 pm
@TaTyTu777 yes, it is.
1. August 2010 at 11:50 pm
@Neueregel another thing…its bluetooth, not bloodtooth lol
2. August 2010 at 12:15 am
@Neueregel yeah, but ufewl said that he couldnt transfer nothing =$
it works simply fine with me =P
2. August 2010 at 12:48 am
@hawnkblade I second that. Actually i can connect this baby with 3 ways to PC. 1. Bloodtooth 2. Nokia Ovi PC suite mode (USB) or 3. Mass Storage (USB) like extra flash drive/disk. It rocks.
2. August 2010 at 1:27 am
@ufewl
thats not true i have this phone for a year and im contented with it is pack with features,, yes it doesnt look good in appearance but its performance wise and its worth buying
2. August 2010 at 2:05 am
@ufewl thats only ur god damn fucking stupid opinion, because with me it works fine, and i can transfer everything to my pc without buying any gay shit, if you dont know how to work with this,buy the manual…idiot…
2. August 2010 at 2:17 am
is this phone thicker than the ipod cause it looks thick!?
2. August 2010 at 2:49 am
My friends have this phone and they say it’s very good. No complains. I was going to buy it but I like the C6 better. But it’s a nice phone.
2. August 2010 at 3:23 am
@TaTyTu777 Yeah
2. August 2010 at 3:24 am
so cool
2. August 2010 at 3:40 am
Is this considered as a third generation mobile phone?
2. August 2010 at 4:35 am
don’t buy one of these, you can’t transfers some of you stuff to your PC without buying Microsoft Outlook which costs £120.
And even then it does not work apparently!!
2. August 2010 at 4:35 am
@jako3417 The HTC is a smartphone with windows meaning you get several more features via windows while nokia uses OVi (online store) where you have to purchase all your mini apps so an android mobile (htc hero as your example) is a better deal price wise and phone acessibility wise =) Even though I bought the 5800 haha. I just prefer best sound and best video resolution over apps.
2. August 2010 at 4:42 am
@Ziggefreestyle The start menu doesn’t really matter because you get the contact LIST on the start and there you have your hundreds of contacts =) and the 5800 is very light for it’s size so weight isn’t a problem and YES i watch movies all the time on mine
Sorry for the super late reply, hope you didn’t go with the 5530 haha.
2. August 2010 at 4:42 am
i have duhh 5230 nuron i thinnk its better
2. August 2010 at 5:18 am
@aiesshinichi because n73 has a smaller screen resolution…compared to nokia 5800 it has 3.2″ of screen….duh!!this phone has 640×420 screen resolution….
2. August 2010 at 5:54 am
@CroUltimateOne i wanted to get a iphone but here in portugal its still 500 euros for the original 3g version…
2. August 2010 at 5:55 am
@nuwan550 well i phone is good but it cost a lot comparing it to this nokia
U should myb try to buy nokia 5530 its the new model of this one <3 i have it
2. August 2010 at 6:13 am
@aiesshinichi although it is 3.2mp Carl Zeiss Lens… ts quality is not that good compared to N73′s 3.2mp Carl Zeiss Lens… have u tried using it @ night time? or dim places?
2. August 2010 at 7:10 am
its to big the pen is rubish and i can not bealeav i wanted it for a muinit there
2. August 2010 at 7:33 am
@jehril 3.2 MP by Carl Zeiss, i was once use this phone, video quality is great, not shaky and clear. seriously i love the camera of this phone, i dont have to buy any digital camera or camcorder =)
2. August 2010 at 8:09 am
@nuwan550 or Iphone 3G S…? =(
2. August 2010 at 8:40 am
nokia 5800 or i phone 3g??????